Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

NovelPoint Learning LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. et al, No. 6:10-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:10-cv-00229, Dkt. No. 133
Decided
February 27, 2012
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying the Defendants' 107 Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness and Lack of Written Description
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness and Lack of Written Description (Doc. No. 107). Plaintiff has responded (Doc. No. 110), to which Defendants have replied (Doc. No. 114). The Court heard argument on January 12, 2012. Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments, Defendants’ motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND I. The Patent at Issue The ‘427 patent “relates to the field of talking novelty devices or toys.” ‘427 patent at 1:4-5.