Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SmartPhone Technologies LLC v. Research In Motion Corporation et al, No. 6:10-cv-00074 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2013)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:10-cv-00074, Dkt. No. 647
Decided
March 1, 2013
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 629 SEALED MOTION Apple Inc.'s REBUTTAL MOTION for Immediate Compliance with SmartPhone's Discovery Obligations AND Apple Inc.'s OPPOSITION to Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Clarification of Order on …
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff SmartPhone Technologies, LLC’s (“SmartPhone”) Emergency Motion for Clarification of Orde r on Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 624) (“M TN FOR CLARIFICATION”). Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) has filed a response (Doc. No. 628), in which co-Defendants LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (“collectively, “LG”) join (Doc. No. 633). Apple’s response also serves as a rebuttal Motion for Immediate Compliance with SmartPhone’s Discovery Obliga tions (Doc. No. 629).