Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Prompt Medical Systems, L.P. v. AllscriptsMisys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. et al, No. 6:10-cv-00071 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:10-cv-00071, Dkt. No. 387
Decided
December 15, 2011
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,483,443 (“the ‘443 patent”). BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Prompt Medical Systems, L.P. (“Prompt”) , filed suit against multiple defendants on March 2, 2010, all eging infringement of the ‘443 patent. Prompt then filed suit against Medicomp Systems, Inc. on April 13, 2011, also alleging infringement of the ‘443 patent. These two cases were consolidated on August 16, 2011, per consent of the parties. See Docket No. 360.