Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al, No. 6:09-cv-00446 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the term “browser application” in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,838,906 (“the ‘906 patent”) and 7,599,985 (“the ‘985 patent”). The Court has already construed the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. See Docket Nos. 914 & 989. The parties now, less than two weeks before trial, dispute the construction of the term “browser application.” ANALYSIS Defendants propose “a program used to [view or ] browse electronic documents.” 1 Plaintiffs propose “a client program that presents an interface and…