Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Canrig Drilling Technology Ltd. v. Omron Oilfield and Marine, Inc. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00414 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2011)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00414, Dkt. No. 93
Decided
February 11, 2011
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this order
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION CANRIG DRILLING TECHNOLOGY LTD Plaintiff, vs. OMRON OILFIELD AND MARINE INC., et al. Defendants. § § § § § CASE NO. 6:09-CV-414 § PATENT CASE § § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This opinion construes the disputed terms in United States Patent No. 6,050,348. BACKGROUND Canrig asserts claims 1–5 of the ‘348 patent against Omron Oilfield and Marine, Inc. and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Each claim is an independent claim.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case