Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00399 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2012)

Denied
Claim Construction Summary Judgment Indefiniteness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00399, Dkt. No. 366
Decided
January 20, 2012
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. Defts' 249 Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness for Certain Claims is DENIED
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,487,069 (“the ‘069 patent”). Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness for Certain Claims (Docket No. 249). BACKGROUND Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (“CSIRO”) asserts the ‘069 patent against AT&T Inc.; AT&T Mobility LLC; AT&T Wi -Fi Services f/k/a Wayport, Inc.; Acer America Corporati on; Acer, Inc.; Atheros Communications, Inc.; Broadcom Corporation;…

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error