Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Allvoice Developments US, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., No. 6:09-cv-00366 (E.D. Tex. May 26, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00366, Dkt. No. 76
Decided
May 26, 2010
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, and ORDER re 75 MOTION for Protective Order Limiting Scope of Discovery in Subpoenas Duces Tecum and Ad Testificandum filed by Advanced Voice Recognition Systems Inc. The Court ORDERS the parties to provide by June 3…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is third-parties Advance Voice Recognition Systems, Inc. Douglas Holt, Michael K. Davis, and Joseph Miglietta’s (collectively, “AVRS”) motion for protective order to limit the scope of discovery sought in subpoenas issued and served by Plaintiff Allvoice Developments US, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Defendant”) (Doc. No. 75). The Court has concerns AVRS’s motion is not properly before this Court. See In re Clients and Former Clients of Baron & Budd, P.C., 478 F.3d 670, 671 (5th Cir.