Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raylon, LLC v. Advanced Public Safety, Inc. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00356 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00356, Dkt. No. 99
Decided
March 23, 2011
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER converting 70 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Under F.R.C.P. 12(c) filed by Symbol Technologies, Inc. to a Motion for Summary Judgment on Non-Infringement, and granting the motion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Upon consideration of the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, the Court GRANTS Casio America, Inc. and Casio Computer, Co., Ltd.’s (collectively “Casio”) Motion for 1 Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Docket No. 8 in 6:09cv355), GRANTS Complus Data Innovations’ (“Complus”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Docket No. 25 in 6:09cv355), DENIES AS MOOT Casio’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Invalidity (Docket No.