Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Celltrace LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00294 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00294, Dkt. No. 289
Decided
February 23, 2011
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the claim constructions as set forth in this order
Length
56 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,011,976 (“the ‘976 patent”) and 7,551,933 (“the ‘933 patent”), asserted by Plaintiff Celltrace LLC (“Celltrace”). Celltrace alleges AT&T Mobility, f/k/a Cingular Wireless LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Alltel Corporation, Alltel Communications, LLC, and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless1 (collectively, “Defendants”) infringe the ‘976 and ‘933 patents. The parties have presented their2 claim construction positions (Doc. Nos. 206, 218, & 222).