Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Soverain Software LLC v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 332
Decided
January 13, 2011
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SOVERAIN SOFTWARE LLC, Plaintiff, vs. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § CASE NO. 6:09-CV-274 § PATENT CASE § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,715,314 (“the ’314 patent”), 5,909,492 (“the ’492 patent”), and 7,272,639 (“the ’639 patent”). BACKGROUND Two earlier cases before this Court relate to the patents-in-suit. In Soverain Software LLC v.