Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Norman IP Holdings, LLC v. Casio Computer Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00270 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00270, Dkt. No. 181
Decided
October 27, 2010
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 132 Alternative Motion to Transfer to the Southern District of California
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Kyocera Corporation, Kyocera Communications, Inc. and Kyocera Wireless Corp. (“Kyocera”), and Sierra Wireless, Inc. and Sierra Wireless America, Inc.’s (“Sierra Wireless”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Norman IP Holdings, LLC’s1 (“Norman”) Fourth Amended Complaint, or alternatively, to transfer to the Southern District of California (Doc. No. 132). The Court recommended that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be denied and held the alternative motion to transfer in abeyance (Doc. No. 161).