Norman IP Holdings, LLC v. Casio Computer Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00270 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2010)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendants Kyocera Corporation, Kyocera Communications, Inc. and Kyocera Wireless Corp. (“Kyocera”), and Sierra Wireless, Inc. and Sierra Wireless America, Inc.’s (“Sierra Wireless”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Norman IP Holdings, LLC’s1 (“Norman”) Fourth Amended Complaint, or alternatively, to transfer to the Southern District of California (Doc. No. 132). The Court recommended that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be denied and held the alternative motion to transfer in abeyance (Doc. No. 161).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error