Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00269 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2011)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00269, Dkt. No. 369
Decided
January 10, 2011
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this order
Length
43 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,893,120 (“the ‘120 patent”). Plaintiff Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC (“Bedrock”) alleges Softlawyer Technologies, Inc., Citiware Technology Solutions, LLC, Google, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., MySpace Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Match.com, Inc., and AOL Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) infringe the ‘1201 patent. The parties have presented their claim construction positions (Doc. Nos. 275, 284, & 300).