Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cheetah Omni LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00260 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00260, Dkt. No. 132
Decided
November 9, 2010
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
n D. Love on 11/9/10. (mjc, )MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,145,704 and 7,522,836. For the ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to this Orde…
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,145,704 (“the ‘704 Patent”) and 7,522,836 (“the ‘836 Patent”). Plaintiff Cheetah Omni, LLC (“Plaintiff”) alleges Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., and Verizon Enterprise Delivery LLC1 (collectively “Defendant”) infringe the ‘704 and ‘836 patents. The parties have presented their claim construction positions (Doc. Nos. 109, “PL.’S BR.” 113, “DEF.’S RESP.,” 115, “PL.’S REPLY”).