Emanuel v. SPX Corporation, No. 6:09-cv-00220 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 2009)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendant SPX Corporation’s (“SPX”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Minnesota (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 16) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Plaintiff Cedric R. Emanuel d/b/a Just Wh eels (“Just Wh eels”) has filed a Response to D efendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue (“Response”) (Doc. No. 32), and Defendant also filed a Reply Brief in Support of the Mo tion to Tr ansfer Venue (“Reply”) ( Doc. N o. 36 ).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error