Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Emanuel v. SPX Corporation, No. 6:09-cv-00220 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 18, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00220, Dkt. No. 49
Decided
September 18, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER denying 16 MOTION to Change Venue filed by SPX Corporation, OTC Tools Division
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant SPX Corporation’s (“SPX”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Minnesota (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 16) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Plaintiff Cedric R. Emanuel d/b/a Just Wh eels (“Just Wh eels”) has filed a Response to D efendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue (“Response”) (Doc. No. 32), and Defendant also filed a Reply Brief in Support of the Mo tion to Tr ansfer Venue (“Reply”) ( Doc. N o. 36 ).