Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

i2 Technologies, Inc. et al v. Oracle Corporation et al, No. 6:09-cv-00194 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00194, Dkt. No. 158
Decided
August 17, 2010
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 35 Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Oracle Corporation and Oracle USA, Inc.’s (collectively “Oracle”) Motion to1 Transfer Venue (Docket No. 35) is before the Court. Having considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court DENIES the motion. BACKGROUND i2 Technologies, Inc. and i2 Technologies US, Inc. (collectively “i2”) brought this suit for patent infringement against Oracle. i2 accuses Oracle of infringing eleven of its United States patents.