Acqis LLC v. International Business Machines Corp, No. 6:09-cv-00148 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,216,185 (“the ’185 Patent”), 6,718,415 (the “’8,415 Patent”), 7,099,981 (the “’981 Patent”), 7,146,446 (the “’446 Patent”), 7,328,297 (the “’297 Patent”), 7,363,415 (the “’3,415 Patent”), 7,363,416 (the “’416 Patent”), and 7,376,779 (the “’779 Patent”) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”). Furthermore, after considering the briefing and oral argument, and for the reasons explained below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness Under 35 U.S.C.