Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PACid Group, LLC v. Apple Inc. et al, No. 6:09-cv-00143 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2010)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00143, Dkt. No. 314
Decided
July 15, 2010
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court construes the disputed claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. The Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to this Order as an Appendix
Length
45 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion and Order sets forth the Court’s constructions for the disputed claim terms in the patents asserted by Plaintiff The PACid Group, LLC (“PACid”). PACid asserts U.S. Patent Nos. 5,963,646 (“the ‘646 patent”) and 6,049,612 (“the ‘612 patent”) and has filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief (Doc. No. 251) (“Opening”), as well as a Reply in support of PACid’s proposed constructions (Doc. No. 269) (“Reply”). Defendants Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation, Intel Corporation, and Marvell Semiconductor Inc.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error