Whipstock Services, Inc. v. Schlumberger Ltd, No. 6:09-cv-00113 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Schlumberger Technology Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Strike Plaintiff Whipstock Services, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Infringement Contentions or in the Alternative to Compel Infringement Contentions in Compliance with Local Patent Rule 3-1 (Doc. No. 55). The parties fully briefed the matter (Doc. Nos. 62, 64, 74). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. DISCUSSION Plaintiff has accused Defendant of infringing one or more claims of U.S. Patent No.