Chirife v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al, No. 6:08-cv-00480 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2009)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is St. Jude Medical, Inc. (“SJM”), Pacesetter, Inc. (“Pacesetter”), and St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.’s (“SJMSC”) (collectively “Defendants”) motion to transfer venue (Docket No. 13). Also before the Court is D r. Raul Chirife’s motion for leave to f ile supplemental facts regarding Defendants’ motion to transfer venue (Docket No. 42). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is DENIED, and Dr. Chirife’s motion for leave is DENIED as moot. BACKGROUND Dr.