Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Centre One v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al, No. 6:08-cv-00467 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00467, Dkt. No. 155
Decided
August 10, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 34 Motion to Dismiss; denying 39 Motion to Change Venue; denying 58 Motion to Sever; denying 60 Motion to Dismiss; denying 90 Motion to Dismiss; denying 90 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; den…
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Verizon Comm unication Inc.’s (“VCI”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal juri sdiction (Docket Nos. 34 & 60); Verizon California Inc., Verizon Delaware LLC, Verizon Florida LLC, Verizon Maryland Inc., Verizon New England Inc., Verizon New Jersey Inc., Verizon New York Inc., Verizon Northwest Inc., Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc., Verizon South Inc., Verizon Virginia Inc.’s ( collectively “the Regional Verizons”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Docket No.