Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pozen Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., No. 6:08-cv-00437 (E.D. Tex. June 18, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00437, Dkt. No. 257
Decided
June 18, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER setting forth the Court's constructions for the disputed claim terms in the patents asserted by Plaintiff Pozen Inc. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to …
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion and Order sets forth the Court’s constructions for the disputed claim terms in the patents asserted by Plaintiff Pozen Inc. (“Pozen”). Pozen asserts U.S. Patent Nos. 6,060,499 (“the ‘499 patent”), 6,586,458 (“the ‘458 patent”), and 7,332,183 (“the ‘183 patent”) and has filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief (Doc. No. 164) (“Opening”), as well as a Reply in support of Pozen’s proposed constructions (Doc. No. 176) (“Reply”). Defendants Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Alphapharm Pty Ltd., and Dr . Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc.