Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Motiva LLC v. Nintendo Co Ltd et al, No. 6:08-cv-00429 (E.D. Tex. June 30, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00429, Dkt. No. 46
Decided
June 30, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 17 Motion to Change Venue
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Nintendo of America, Inc. (“Nintendo America”) and Nintendo Co. Ltd.’s (“Nintendo Co.”) (c ollectively “Defendants”) motion to transfer venue ( Docket No. 17). Afte r consideration of the parties’ briefing, Defendants’ motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND On November 10, 2008, Motiva, LLC (“Motiva”) filed this action alleging that Defendants infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,292,151 (the “‘151 patent”). Motiva is organized under the laws of Ohio and has its principal place of business in Dublin, Ohio.