Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Acceleron, LLC v. Egenera, Inc. et al, No. 6:08-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex. June 9, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00417, Dkt. No. 176
Decided
June 9, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 69 Motion to Change Venue; denying 85 Motion to Change Venue; denying 91 Motion to Change Venue; denying 97 Motion to Change Venue; denying 98 Motion to Change Venue; granting 99 Motion to Dismiss for La…
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Hewlett-Pac kard’s (“HP”) motion to transfer venue (Docket No. 69), NEC Corporation of Ame rica’s (“ NEC”) m otion to transfe r venue (Doc ket No. 85), Sun Microsystem’s (“Sun”) motion to t ransfer venue (Docket No. 9 1), Supermicro Computer, Inc.’s motion to transfer venue (“Supermicro”) (Docket No. 97), Egenera, Inc.’s (“Egenera”) motion to transfer venue (Docket No.