Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Verizon Clinton Center Drive Corp et al, No. 6:08-cv-00385 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00385, Dkt. No. 431
Decided
August 11, 2010
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this Order
Length
43 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,388,101 (“the ‘101 Patent”) and 5,481,546 (“the ‘546 Patent”) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”). Plaintiff Eon Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiff”) alleges Defendant Verizon Clinton Center Drive Corp. (“Defendant”) infringes the ‘101 and ‘546 Patents. The parties have presented their claim1 construction positions (Doc. Nos. 270, 274, 281). Also before the Court is claim construction briefing from Plaintiff and Sensus USA Inc.