Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. Diamond Innovations Inc, No. 6:08-cv-00325 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2010)

Denied
Motions in Limine Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00325, Dkt. No. 363
Decided
August 2, 2010
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 196 Motion in Limine No. 5, with the condition that licenses would not be defined or identified as litigation licenses
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Diamond Innovations’ Motion in Limine No. 5 (Docket No. 196). Having considered the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, the Court DENIES the motion. BACKGROUND On August 15, 2008, ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. and ReedHycalog, LP (collectively, “ReedHycalog”) brought suit against Diamond Innovations, Inc. (“Diamond Innovations”) alleging infringement of several U.S. patents (the “Patents-in-Suit”).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case