Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cheetah Omni LLC v. Samsung Electronics USA, Inc. et al, No. 6:08-cv-00279 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2009)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00279, Dkt. No. 166
Decided
December 21, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this order. The claims with the disputed terms in bold are set forth in Appendix A. The Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a tab…
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION CHEETAH OMNI LLC Plaintiff, vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and MITSUBISHI DIGITAL ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:08 CV 279 § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,339,714 (the “’714 Patent”).1 BACKGROUND The ’714 Patent issued on March 4, 2008 to Mohammed N.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error