Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

j2 Global Communications Inc v. Protus IP Solutions Inc, No. 6:08-cv-00211 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00211, Dkt. No. 44
Decided
December 23, 2008
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Defendants' Motions to Transfer Venue are DENIED
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On May 29, 2008, Plaintiff j2 Global Communications, Inc. (“j2”) filed a complaint against Protus IP Solutions (“Protus”). On June 26, 2008, j2 filed separate complaints against Captaris, Inc. (“Captaris”), and Easylink International Corporation (“Easylink”). On June 30, 2008, j2 filed a complaint against Comodo Group, Ltd. and Comodo Communications, Inc. (“Comodo”). (Referred to collectively as “D efendants.”) In all four cases, j2 a lleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,597,688 (“the ‘688 Patent”) and 7,020,132 (“the ‘132 patent”).