Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Occupational & Medical Innovations, Ltd., No. 6:08-cv-00120 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2009)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00120, Dkt. No. 113
Decided
August 10, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. The Court's claim constructions are set forth in a table in Appendix B. The asserted claims with the disputed terms in bold are …
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

For the purposes of the claim terms at issue, there is no consequence resulting from choices made to cite to1 the specification of the‘584 or the ‘224 patent for material that is the same in both patents. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Plaintiff, vs. OCCUPATIONAL & MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, LTD. Defendant. § § § § § CASE NO. 6:08 CV 120 § § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This claim construction opinion interprets the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case