Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Invitrogen Corporation v. General Electric Company et al, No. 6:08-cv-00113 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00113, Dkt. No. 50
Decided
February 9, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 30 Motion to Change Venue
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defe ndants General Electric Company d.b.a. GE H ealthcare and GE Healthcare Bio-Scinces Corp.’s (collectively “GE”) Motion to Transfer Venue, (Doc. No. 30), Reply in Support, (Doc. No. 37), and Plaintiff Invitrogen Corp.’s (“Invitrogen”) Response, (Doc. No. 35). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND Invitrogen is a De laware cor poration, with its principal place of business in Carlsbad, California a nd manufa cturing and distri bution fac ilities loca ted in Fr ederick, Mary land.