Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 6:08-cv-00088 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2010)

Granted in Part
Claim Construction Indefiniteness Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00088, Dkt. No. 302
Decided
August 11, 2010
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 156 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
40 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion and Order construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,006,227 (the “’227 Patent”), 6,638,313 (the “’313 Patent”), 6,725,427 (the “’427 Patent”), 6,768,999 (the “’999 Patent”), and 6,613,101 (the “’101 Patent”). The Court further GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 2 (Docket No. 156).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case