Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fenner Investments, Ltd., v. 3Com Corporation et al, No. 6:08-cv-00061 (E.D. Tex. May 26, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00061, Dkt. No. 265
Decided
May 26, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. The Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to this opinion as Appendix A
Length
49 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,842,224 (“the ‘224 patent”) and 7,145,906 (“the ‘906 patent”). In the above-styled cause of action, Plaintiff Fenner Investments Ltd. (“Fenner”) accuses Defendants Extreme Networks, Inc. and Enterasys Networks, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) of infringing claims 3, 8, and 12 of the ‘224 patent and claims 9, 10, 19, and 20 of the ‘906 patent. The parties have submitted a number of claim terms for construction. Fenner filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief, (Doc. No.