Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Aloft Media LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 6:08-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 161
Decided
March 24, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to this opinion as Appendix…
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim const ruction opinion construes the disputed ter m in United States Patent No. 7,305,625 (“the ‘625 patent”). In t he above-styled cause of action, Plaintiff Aloft Media, LLC (“Aloft”) accuses Defendants Google Inc. (“Google”), Yahoo! Inc., and AOL LLC of infringing the ‘625 patent. The parties have agreed to constructions for all of the terms in the ‘625 patent, except for one term disputed by Google. Aloft has filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief (Doc. No. 123) and a Reply Brief (Doc. No.