Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Davis-Lynch Inc v. Weatherford Int'l Inc, No. 6:07-cv-00559 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00559, Dkt. No. 149
Decided
April 20, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
51 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in United St ates Patent No. 6,679,336 (“the ‘336 pate nt”). In the above -styled ca use of a ction, Plaintiff Davis-L ynch, Inc. (“Davis-Lynch”) accuses Defendant Weatherford International, Inc. (“Weatherford”) of infringing claims 33, 34, 35, 37, and 51 of the ‘336 patent. The parties have submitted a number of claim terms for construction. Davis-Lynch has filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief (Doc. No. 94) and a Reply Cla im Co nstruction B rief ( Doc. N o. 11 9).