Typhoon Touch Technologies, Inc et al v. Motion Computing, Inc et al, No. 6:07-cv-00546 (E.D. Tex. July 23, 2009)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of indefiniteness (Docket N o. 35 4). A fter c onsidering the br iefing a nd or al a rgument, Defendants’ m otion is GRANTED in part for the reasons explained below. This opinion also construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,379,057 (the “‘057 patent”) and 5,675,362 (the “‘362 patent”). BACKGROUND The ‘057 patent issued on January 3, 1995, and the ‘362 patent issued on October 7, 1997. The ‘362 patent is a continuation of the ‘057 patent.