Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Astec America Inc. v. Power-One Inc. et al, No. 6:07-cv-00464 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00464, Dkt. No. 63
Decided
April 11, 2008
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 41 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Power-One, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement (Doc. No. 41), Astec America, Inc.’s Opposition (Doc. No. 49), Power- One’s Reply (Doc. No. 50), a nd Astec’s Surreply (Doc. No. 51). F or the re asons stated he rein, Power-One’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement is hereby DENIED in its entirety. I. BACKGROUND Astec and Power-One are competitors in the ac-dc and dc-dc power supply industry.