Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

BarTex Research LLC v. FedEx Corporation et al, No. 6:07-cv-00385 (E.D. Tex. June 10, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00385, Dkt. No. 176
Decided
June 10, 2011
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 171 Motion for Attorney Fees
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant FedEx Corporation’s (“FedEx”) Motion to Award Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. No. 171). FedEx has also filed a Reply (Doc. No. 174), while Plaintiff BarTex Research, LLC, (“BarTex”) has filed both a Response (Doc. No. 173) and a Surreply (Doc. No. 175). The instant motion presents a number of issues with respect to Defendant’s request for an award of fees. Having fully considered the parties’ arguments and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant FedEx’s Motion to Award Attorneys’ Fees.