Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Creative Internet Advertising Corporation v. Yahoo! Inc et al, No. 6:07-cv-00354 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2010)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00354, Dkt. No. 325
Decided
February 1, 2010
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER re 286 SEALED MOTION for Entry of Judgment on the Verdict filed by CREATIVE INTERNET ADVERTISING CORPORATION. Plaintiffs request for prejudgment and post-judgment interest is GRANTED
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Creative Internet Advertising Corporation’s (“CIAC”) Motion for Entry of Judgment on the Verdict and Request for Enhanced Damages, a Finding That the Case is Exceptional, Attorney’s Fees, Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest, Supplemental Damages and Post-Verdict Royalty (Doc. No. 286) (“Motion”). Defendant Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”) has filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 292) (“Response”). CIAC also submitted a Reply in support of its Motion (Doc. No. 285).