Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lonestar Inventions, L.P. v. Nintendo of America, Inc., No. 6:07-cv-00261 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 14, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00261, Dkt. No. 83
Decided
April 14, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Claim Construction Opinion interprets the disputed terms in United States Patent No. 5,208,725 (“the ‘725 patent”). Appendix A contains the disputed terms, as they appear in the claims of the ‘725 pa tent. Appen dix B contains a c hart summarizing the Court’s construction of the disputed terms and the parties’ agreed constructions. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lonestar Inventions, LP (“Lonestar”) accuses Defendant Nintendo of America, Inc. (“Nintendo”) of infringing claims in the ‘725 patent.