Michael S Sutton Limited v. Nokia Corporation et al, No. 6:07-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2009)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.’s (collectively “Nokia”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the issues of indefiniteness, enablement, and utility (Docket No. 82) and Nokia’ s motion t o strike the dec laration of Dr. Ha rley Myler (Docket No. 102). A fter considering the briefing and oral ar gument, the Court GRANTS Nokia’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Nokia’s motion to strike for the reasons explained below. This opinion also construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,771,238 (the “‘238 Patent”).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error