Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Michael S Sutton Limited v. Nokia Corporation et al, No. 6:07-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 129
Decided
August 10, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 82 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 102 Motion to Strike. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. The disputed claims are set forth in App…
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.’s (collectively “Nokia”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the issues of indefiniteness, enablement, and utility (Docket No. 82) and Nokia’ s motion t o strike the dec laration of Dr. Ha rley Myler (Docket No. 102). A fter considering the briefing and oral ar gument, the Court GRANTS Nokia’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Nokia’s motion to strike for the reasons explained below. This opinion also construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,771,238 (the “‘238 Patent”).