Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Good Sportsman Marketing, LLC et al v. Non Typical, Inc., No. 6:07-cv-00177 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00177, Dkt. No. 139
Decided
August 10, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 109 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Because the parties have stipulated to the Court's claim construction, those definitions are provided in Appendix A to this opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Non Typical, Inc, Mark Cuddeback, and Richar d Scales Adve rtising Associates, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion for partial summary judgment on indefiniteness (Docket No. 109). The Court DENIES the motion. This opinion also construes the terms of U.S. Patent Numbers 6,735,387 (the “‘387 patent”) and 6,758,868 (the “‘868 patent”).