Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Clear With Computers v. Recreational Equipment, Inc et al, No. 6:07-cv-00138 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00138, Dkt. No. 805
Decided
August 21, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. The Court's interpretations of the claims are set forth in Appendix B. The asserted claims are set forth in Appendix A
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Cour t fully incor porates its claim cons truction opi nions in the Staples and Hyundai cases into this1 opinio n. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ORION IP, LLC Plaintiff vs. XEROX CORPORATION, et al. Defendants § § § § § CASE NO. 607 CV 138 § PATENT CASE § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court previously construed the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,367,627 (the “‘627 patent”) and 5,615,342 (the “‘342 patent”) in Orion IP, LLC v. Staples, Inc. (the “Staples Opinion”) and in Orion IP, LLC v.