Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

VirnetX, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 6:07-cv-00080 (E.D. Tex. July 30, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00080, Dkt. No. 246
Decided
July 30, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this order. For ease of reference, the Court's claim constructions are set forth in a table in Appendix B. The disputed claims with the disp…
Length
35 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION VIRNETX, INC. Plaintiff vs. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Defendant § § § § § CASE NO. 6:07 CV 80 § PATENT CASE § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This claim construction opinion interprets the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,135 (“the ‘135 patent”); 6,839,759 (“the ‘759 patent”); and 7,188,180 (“the ‘180 patent”). Appendix A contains the disputed terms, as they appear in the asserted claims of these patents. Appendix B contains a chart summarizing the Court’s constructions.