Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fenner Investment, Ltd v. Microsoft Corporation et al, No. 6:07-cv-00008 (E.D. Tex. June 3, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00008, Dkt. No. 334
Decided
June 3, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 207 and 208 Motions for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement, and denying as moot 318 Motion for Clarification of Claim Construction
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Cou rt a re Ni ntendo Co ., Ltd., N intendo o f A merica I nc.’s ( collectively “Nintendo”), and Micr osoft Corp.’s (“ Microsoft”) Motions for Summary J udgment of Non- Infringement ( Docket N o. 20 7 & 20 8) a nd De fendants’ Mo tion f or Cla rification of Cla im1 Construction (Docket No. 318). After reviewing the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments and for the reasons set forth below, Nintendo’s and Microsoft’s motions for summary judgment are GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion for Clarification is DENIED as moot.