Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alcatel USA Sourcing, Inc v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 6:06-cv-00500 (E.D. Tex. June 27, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00500, Dkt. No. 103
Decided
June 27, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth, and are set forth in a table as Appendix B. The claims with the disputed terms in bold are set forth in Appendix A
Length
39 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALCATEL USA RESOURCES INC. Plaintiff vs. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Defendant § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:06 CV 500 § PATENT CASE § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,659,539 (the “‘539 Patent”), 5,731,844 (the “‘844 Patent”), 5,864,682 (the “‘682 Patent”), 6,112,226 (the “‘226 Patent”), and 6,823,390 (the “‘390 Patent”). BACKGROUND This case involves three sets of patents.