Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alcatel USA Sourcing, Inc v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 6:06-cv-00499 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00499, Dkt. No. 128
Decided
August 21, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. The Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table as Appendix B. The claims with the disputed terms in bold are set for…
Length
49 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALCATEL USA SOURCING, INC. Plaintiff vs. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Defendant § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:06 CV 499 § PATENT CASE § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,339,830 (the “‘830 Patent”), 6,661,799 (the “‘799 Patent”), 6,674,767 (the “‘767 Patent”), 6,874,090 (the “‘090 Patent”), and 6,944,273 (the “‘273 Patent”). BACKGROUND This case involves five patents.