Bhandari v. Cadence Design Systems Inc et al, No. 6:06-cv-00480 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2007)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Magma Design Automation, Inc., Altera Design Corp., and Mentor Graphics Corp.’s (collectively “Defendants” ) Motion to1 Dismiss or Transfer (Docket No. 33) and Plaintiff Narpat Bhandari’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 46). The Court has considered the parties’ written arguments. Because the Cou rt la cks su bject ma tter j urisdiction to he ar t his c ase, th e Cou rt GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss and DENIES Bhandari’s motion for leave.