Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rfid World Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Stores et al, No. 6:06-cv-00363 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00363, Dkt. No. 140
Decided
February 11, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION construing the terms in U.S.Patent No. 6,967,563. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table as Appendix B. The claims with the disputed terms in bold are set forth in Appendix A
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION RFID TRACKER LTD. Plaintiff vs. WAL-MART STORES INC.; THE GILLETE COMPANY; MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.; TARGET CORPORATION; and PFIZER HEALTH SOLUTIONS Defendants § § § § § CASE NO. 6:06 CV 363 § PATENT CASE § § § § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes the terms in United States Patent No. 6,967,563 (the “‘563 Patent”).