Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GTX Corporation v. Kofax Image Products Inc et al, No. 6:06-cv-00244 (E.D. Tex. July 10, 2008)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00244, Dkt. No. 435
Decided
July 10, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 428 Order and the eleven motions for summary judgment and Defendant Canon U.S.A. Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Sanctions. The Court grants Canon's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement 371 and Defendant…
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the parties’ eleven motions for summary judgment and Defendant Canon U.S.A., Inc.’s (“Canon”) Renewed Motion for Sanctions. After careful consideration of the parties’ oral arguments a nd written s ubmissions, th e Cou rt GRANTS Defendant Canon U .S.A., Inc.’s (“Canon”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Docket No. 371) and Defendant Kofax Inc.’s (“Kofax”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Docket No. 390).