Clearvalue, Inc. et al v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc. et al, No. 6:06-cv-00197 (E.D. Tex. July 17, 2006)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pl aintiffs allege that Defendan ts infringe claims 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 of1 the ‘690 patent. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION CLEARVALUE, INC. AND § RICHARD ALAN HAASE § § Plaintiffs § § vs. § § PEARL RIVER POLYMERS, INC., § POLYCHEMIE INC., SNF, INC., § POLYDYNE, INC. AND § SNF HOLDING COMPANY § § Defendants § CASE NO. 6:06 CV 197 MEMORANDUM OPINION This Claim Construction Opinion construes terms in United States Patent No. 6,120,690 (“the ‘690 patent”).