Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

z4 Technologies, Inc v. Microsoft Corporation et al, No. 6:06-cv-00142 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 18, 2006)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00142, Dkt. No. 407
Decided
August 18, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 406 Memorandum & Opinion. (DUPLICATE ENTRY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING PURPOSES)
Length
50 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant Autodesk Inc.’s (“Autodesk”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of La w o f N oninfringement (D ocket N o. 33 0); De fendant Mi crosoft Co rporation’s (“Micrososft”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Noninfringement (Docket No. 332); Defendants Microsoft and Autodesk’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Docket No. 319); Microsoft’s Motion for Judgment as a Ma tter of Law Regarding Damages, Non-Retail Products, and Willfulness (Docket No.